Is Burning a Poor Use of Funds?

The bear case for burning.

Tom Littler
Oct 5, 2021

Is Burning a Poor Use of Funds?

The bear case for burning.

Your favourite micro-cap project is at a $4.8m mcap. You know at $5.0m there’s going to be a $20k burn. $20k worth of tokens to the ether. You shill the shit out of the burn schedule all over Telegram, Twitter and Reddit. There’s fucking burn gifs everywhere. Arnold’s getting incinerated. Burning house girl is doing the rounds. Stranger things flamethrowers are everywhere. There is hype, there is FOMO. For once in your life, you feel part of something.

Let it burn!

The $5.0m mcap hits. The devs announce $20k of tokens have been sent to Valhalla. You look at your investment, not much has changed, but it doesn’t matter — there will be an even bigger burn at $10m. Let the shilling begin.

If this story sounds familiar, it should. Burns are a commonly used tactic to drive short-term hype, but in a lot of ways, that’s all they are good for. Let’s explore why.

What is Burning

Simply put, burning is the process of removing tokens from supply. This means that the tokens you own are now rarer. When you burn tokens, the marketcap remains the same, but there are fewer tokens in circulation, so you own proportionately more of the total pool. Let’s take an example.

Imagine token $PONZI has a mcap of $1000. There are 1000 tokens in circulation, each of value $1.00 (mcap = total available supply x token price)

You hold 10 tokens. That’s 1% of the total supply, each token is worth $1.

Let’s imagine $PONZI decided to do a 10% burn, reducing the supply from 1000 tokens to 900. The total amount of cash contributed to the pool is the same, so the marketcap stays at $1000.

But you now own 1.11% of the total supply (your 10 tokens / 900 available). The real amount of tokens you hold hasn’t gone up, instead, the cost per token has increased, from $1.00 to $1.11.

This is how a burn works.

Fixed Supply v Inflationary Tokens

One important consideration to make with this article is that I am speaking about tokens with fixed supply utilising burns. This is a league away from inflationary protocols such as Ethereum implementing EIP-1559 to make it deflationary.

“In a fixed supply, there is no danger of tokens decreasing in value due to inflation, a bullish signal for investors. Whereas with inflationary mechanisms, there is always the concern that tokens will be issued at such a rate that it will cause a drop in value to existing holders.”

The reason the distinction is important to make is because in a fixed supply, there is no danger of tokens decreasing in value due to inflation, a bullish signal for investors. Whereas with inflationary mechanisms, there is always the concern that tokens will be issued at such a rate that it will cause a drop in value to existing holders.

Why Burning is Dumb

When a fixed supply token issues a burn, what they are effectively saying is. ‘I think burning this amount of tokens is the best way that I can add value to my community.’ I think this is completely the wrong stance to take, here’s why.

When you burn tokens, you are burning real cash. Cash that could be used to further the development of your project. Let’s take a look at what this could means, using Lithium as the case study.

A $20k burn could instead be used to:

  • Finance development costs for a whole month, allowing real value like a MATIC bridge to be implemented.
  • Finance 1–2 months of a PR campaign with a highly reputable blockchain specific firm
  • Pay a community manager for a whole year.
  • List on an exchange, such as Hotbit.

We are firm believers that we back ourselves to be more ingenious and find better ways to add value to our investors, and our platform, than just burning tokens.

Burn events can also attract the wrong kind of investors, those with short-term mindsets who just want to see a quick pump in their tokens, rather than be involved in the long-term journey of the project.

Lithium’s Stance on Burning

We think burning should be used very sparingly. For certain projects, that are still in the speculative, pre-proof-of-concept phase, burns may have their place. If you can accompany a burn with a well thought out marketing campaign, to drive real adoption of your token, then maybe a burn is an acceptable way to spend tokens.

For most projects though, and especially ones that have a working product, we think burns are a bad use of funds. They’re a short-term tactic in what should be a long-term game. There are far superior ways for teams to spend their cash, and emphasis should be placed on these avenues.

As for Lithium itself, we will practice what we preach, and no longer be burning tokens, we just think there are far better ways to add value.

What’s a Rich Text element?

The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.

Static and dynamic content editing

A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!

How to customize formatting for each rich text

Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.

Get My Latest Content

Join over 2000 curious people in getting my weekly newsletter on productivity, tech,
no-code and everything in between.

🙇🏼 Thanks, you'll get my first issue on Sunday!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
🎉 You'll recieve your first edition on Sunday!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Made by Tom in Webflow